THREAD NAVIGATION:  
    Where am I?   Original message   Top of thread   Current page 
Displays all thread messages Displays thread map That to which this responds This thread's lead message Your most recent Tavern page

I think 4 rangers is a worse team than 4 paladins.
01/22/2006, 02:38:16

    Peter2 writes:

    The ranger's melée fighting capabilities are truly dreadful. In practical terms, the only way in which they are better than those of a mage or lich is their ability to master Armsmastery. A ranger's only advantage over these classes in actual melée weapon skills is a wider choice of weapons. The paladin, with the ability to GM armour, axe, and (I think) cudgel is a hugely better fighter close in.

    Admittedly, a ranger's magic skills tend more towards combat than a paladin's do, with ability to get expert in Elemental rather than Light, but both are picayune.

    IMO, the druid, with GM in dodging and unarmed, is a much better melée fighter than the ranger, and at range, I suspect that an assassin armed with Trolleri would be every bit as good as a ranger armed with Everstrike.





Reply to this message   Back to the Tavern  

Replies to this message