Post: <font face="Verdana,Arial,sans-serif" size="2"><b>Reply to this message</b></font>: Why thief? by Jermy

Original Message: Why thief?
Hmm... The thief is an interesting suggestion. I'm not sure I quite see the merit in the thief, but you certainly must know something I don't (after all, you've been a poster here since the games came out, and have played through them multiple times). What do they bring to the table besides being less-powerful knights? I was thinking about an archer (possibly in addition to another mid-weight character). What's your opinion on them? I guess a good metric would be to compare the performance of two archers against that of a knight and sorcerer (both in close-combat and in spell firepower). How did the druid seem to fall short for you?

Original Message: Why thief?

Hmm... The thief is an interesting suggestion. I'm not sure I quite see the merit in the thief, but you certainly must know something I don't (after all, you've been a poster here since the games came out, and have played through them multiple times). What do they bring to the table besides being less-powerful knights?

I was thinking about an archer (possibly in addition to another mid-weight character). What's your opinion on them? I guess a good metric would be to compare the performance of two archers against that of a knight and sorcerer (both in close-combat and in spell firepower).

How did the druid seem to fall short for you?

Back Reply to this message

Name

E-Mail
(optional)

Subject

Reply options

M
E
S
S
A
G
E
HTML tags allowed in message body. Browser view Display HTML as text.

Link URL

Link Title

Image URL