Post: <font face="Verdana,Arial,sans-serif" size="2"><b>Reply to this message</b></font>: Yes, I agree wholeheartedly. by Peter2

Original Message: Yes, I agree wholeheartedly.
I know you dislike archers, but one of my main reasons for preferring them in this game is that can get expert disarm and they are competent magic users with some access to Light Magic. The ability to Paralyze is sheer gold in combat. I'd also be the first to admit that they're no great shakes as fighters. The Paladin is a far better fighter, but is sadly lacking in combat magic. I also agree about the Shoals, the Lincoln, and the Temple in the Bottle. Boring!

Original Message: Yes, I agree wholeheartedly.

I know you dislike archers, but one of my main reasons for preferring them in this game is that can get expert disarm and they are competent magic users with some access to Light Magic. The ability to Paralyze is sheer gold in combat. I'd also be the first to admit that they're no great shakes as fighters. The Paladin is a far better fighter, but is sadly lacking in combat magic.

I also agree about the Shoals, the Lincoln, and the Temple in the Bottle. Boring!

Back Reply to this message

Name

E-Mail
(optional)

Subject

Reply options

M
E
S
S
A
G
E
HTML tags allowed in message body. Browser view Display HTML as text.

Link URL

Link Title

Image URL