Post: <font face="Verdana,Arial,sans-serif" size="2"><b>Reply to this message</b></font>: The greyscales patch by Radek

Original Message: The greyscales patch
Which patch has been applied first? The official one or the greyscales patch? Note that the official patch is highly "sensitive" to beta versions of MM7, cracked exe's or patched exe's. If the greyscale patch has been applied first then the official patch can refuse cooperating. Note (see posts below): I don't think the problem consists in file systems. I guess that the patch uses a standard file access API so that the underlying IFS (FAT16, FAT32, NTFS) is completely transparent to it. Possible problems can be only with "backward compatibility" (long names on FAT, etc.)

Original Message: The greyscales patch

Which patch has been applied first? The official one or the greyscales patch? Note that the official patch is highly "sensitive" to beta versions of MM7, cracked exe's or patched exe's.

If the greyscale patch has been applied first then the official patch can refuse cooperating.

Note (see posts below): I don't think the problem consists in file systems. I guess that the patch uses a standard file access API so that the underlying IFS (FAT16, FAT32, NTFS) is completely transparent to it. Possible problems can be only with "backward compatibility" (long names on FAT, etc.)

Back Reply to this message

Name

E-Mail
(optional)

Subject

Reply options

M
E
S
S
A
G
E
HTML tags allowed in message body. Browser view Display HTML as text.

Link URL

Link Title

Image URL