Post: <font face="Verdana,Arial,sans-serif" size="2"><b>Reply to this message</b></font>: Yikes, I can see why we'd disagree. by BTB

Original Message: Yikes, I can see why we'd disagree.
The only problem with realism in a game like this is that it turns some classes into gods, and the others into... well, certainly something less than that. I can almost see Druids GM'ing in just Earth and Spirit magics, but not the rest. Even from a realism perspective and not just a balance one, I definitely see fire magic, for example, as primarily a Sorcerer skill. But yes, I do agree that Stealing is a "broken" skill, though in this case "broken" as in "it doesn't work". I would also lump "ID Monster" in that category, as there is a whole host of useful information that is not revealed by that skill.

Original Message: Yikes, I can see why we'd disagree.

The only problem with realism in a game like this is that it turns some classes into gods, and the others into... well, certainly something less than that.

I can almost see Druids GM'ing in just Earth and Spirit magics, but not the rest. Even from a realism perspective and not just a balance one, I definitely see fire magic, for example, as primarily a Sorcerer skill.

But yes, I do agree that Stealing is a "broken" skill, though in this case "broken" as in "it doesn't work". I would also lump "ID Monster" in that category, as there is a whole host of useful information that is not revealed by that skill.

Back Reply to this message

Name

E-Mail
(optional)

Subject

Reply options

M
E
S
S
A
G
E
HTML tags allowed in message body. Browser view Display HTML as text.

Link URL

Link Title

Image URL