Post: <font face="Verdana,Arial,sans-serif" size="2"><b>Reply to this message</b></font>: I disagree on archers by GLENN

Original Message: I disagree on archers
They are way better than they look. In MM6, my archer was doing way better than my paladin in the damage department, thanks to spears, eventhough my paladin was dual-wielding swords. And elemental magic master is a great bonus. Max out their meditation skill, and they should have at least half the mana a maxed-out sorc has. Pretty good support spellcaster IMO. I'm still contemplating on whether to replace the druid with: a) Keep the druid b) Try out the new Ranger. Better fighter, worse caster. c) Monk, though no elemental magic bites. I prefer to have two healers in my party, actually, and the druid is great being a full time healer and caster, due to GM meditation.

Original Message: I disagree on archers

They are way better than they look. In MM6, my archer was doing way better than my paladin in the damage department, thanks to spears, eventhough my paladin was dual-wielding swords. And elemental magic master is a great bonus. Max out their meditation skill, and they should have at least half the mana a maxed-out sorc has. Pretty good support spellcaster IMO.

I'm still contemplating on whether to replace the druid with:

a) Keep the druid b) Try out the new Ranger. Better fighter, worse caster. c) Monk, though no elemental magic bites.

I prefer to have two healers in my party, actually, and the druid is great being a full time healer and caster, due to GM meditation.

Back Reply to this message

Name

E-Mail
(optional)

Subject

Reply options

M
E
S
S
A
G
E
HTML tags allowed in message body. Browser view Display HTML as text.

Link URL

Link Title

Image URL